Around here, we take due process very seriously. Who shredded the toilet paper?
Plausible deniability.
Who got on the side table and chewed Dad’s reading glasses?
Plausible deniability.
Who dragged the dog bed out the backdoor and had inappropriate relations with it?
Plausible deniability.
Who turned a perfectly good towel into decorative fringe?
Plausible deniability.
The prosecution insists there is “overwhelming evidence.”
The defense would like to point out that no one actually witnessed all of the alleged crimes. Furthermore, the defendant would like the court to note that he is, in fact, just a baby. Does this look like the face of a hardened criminal? Or the face of someone who deserves a snack for enduring these outrageous accusations?
Dog Truth according to Buster: If you’re adorable enough, you’re not guilty… you’re simply misunderstood…and a little underbite smiling might help.
Anyway—Off We Go 
The toilet paper still needs picked up, and Buster maintains his innocence, as it was 
that forgot to shut the bathroom door.
© Erica Shoemaker | Anyway—Off We Go
